Liverpool need a defensive midfielder, and everybody knows it. You know it. I know it. They know it. Chelsea know it. Brighton know it. Southampton know it. Jurgen Klopp said it, too.
"It's not surprising we are looking for that position," he said. "It's clear and would be great if we could do something, but for now we can do a lot of things. ... We can adapt the system and have options. But yeah, it would be absolutely great if we could [sign one]."
And this was before Sunday, when Liverpool drew 1-1 with Chelsea, looked brilliant for the first 30 minutes, and then smashed headfirst into the uncomfortable fact that you can have the most talented attacking team in the world, but none of that matters if you can't get the ball and can't keep the ball. They left Stamford Bridge with 35% of the possession -- a lower figure than they recorded in any game last season against a team not named Manchester City.
They agreed to what would have been a record fee for Brighton's Moisés Caicedo, only for the player to opt for Chelsea. Then they dragged their feet in the negotiations for Romeo Lavia, only for him to also reportedly opt for Chelsea.
There are two weeks left in the transfer window, and Liverpool do not have a true holding midfielder on their roster. What can they do?
Well, here's an idea: What if they just completely ignored the position all together?
First, a word about Bill Belichick
This isn't a vacuum. Across all sports, there's a market for players, and the tactical approaches of the day combined with the distribution of available talent creates varying levels of demand for different kinds of players. Outside of maybe the handful of teams funded by sovereign wealth funds in soccer, sports teams can't really just decide on the optimal way to play, and then just acquire the best players for all of the individual roles that would create that playing style.
No, the best way to play is whatever way gets the most out of the players who are realistically available to you given the league's financial constraints.
Steve Nicol explains who would benefit most from signing Moises Caicedo after Chelsea and Liverpool draw 1-1.
For most of his tenure as New England Patriots head coach, Bill Belichick knew this better than anyone. When he took over that team in 2000, most of the NFL was playing the 4-3 defense, which featured four defensive linemen and three linebackers. The linemen required the high-end speed to get to the quarterback when the opponent tried to pass, while the linebackers needed to be big and rangy in order to make tackles whenever the ball advanced past the line.
Instead of copying this and banking on his team's ability to better identify and/or develop talent, Belichick instead opted to play a 3-4 defense. In this setup, the three linemen mostly needed to be large and plug gaps in the line, rather than rush the quarterback, while the outside linebackers tended to specialize in rushing the QB and didn't need to be as beefy as the run-stoppers in the 4-3.
So while the rest of the league was devaluing smaller linebackers and bigger linemen, the Patriots were doing the exact opposite. There were suddenly all of these players who everyone ignored, but New England wanted. "So, if you wanted a nose tackle, there were plenty of them out there," Belichick told the Wall Street Journal in 2015. "If you wanted a 3-4 outside linebacker, there were plenty of them out there."
Under the 3-4, the Patriots won three Super Bowls from 2002 to 2004 -- and then the rest of the league copied them. Within five years of his start in New England, Belichick claimed that more than half of the league had begun playing a 3-4 in response to the Patriots' success.
Remember all of those easy-to-acquire pieces? Now everyone wanted one.
"You go to the draft board and think, 'Here's a nose tackle. Who needs a nose tackle?'" said Belichick. "Well, eight teams in front of you need a nose tackle, and there's two nose tackles."
- Stream on ESPN+: LaLiga, Bundesliga, more (U.S.)
In response, the Patriots pivoted again. "We've had to find different ways to capitalize on the talent that's available," Belichick said. "Otherwise, we're going to get like the fifth-, sixth-, seventh-best guy at whatever the position is. So we've tried to take more of our way in areas that are less populated."
Sounds familiar, huh?
So, back to Liverpool's issue
Craig Burley explains why he would choose Liverpool over Chelsea if he were in Moisés Caicedo's position.
The situation at Anfield isn't quite identical to Belichick's, but it's similar.
Back around 2010, in an era when the patient possession play of Barcelona had begun to influence the rest of Europe, Klopp's high-pressing style -- win the ball high, play it vertically, win it again, and on and on -- created a dual competitive advantage. Not only did it work well on the field against possession-based sides -- breaking play up and attacking the defensive gaps created by causing the turnover -- but it also valued more physical, direct and aggressive players who maybe didn't quite fit the precise, technical prototype that was all the rage across the continent.
Fast-forward to today, and all of the top teams across the world are trying to do different versions of the same thing: they want to press high, and they want to keep the ball as far away from their own goal for as much of the game as possible. The further you turn that dial -- how much you want to press and how much you want to control the field -- the higher the degree of stress you put on your holding midfielder.
That player needs to be the one to clean things up if the first line of the press gets broken, and he also needs to be proficient on the ball to help circulate play in the attacking third and also to move it up there in the first place. In a sense, the requirement is now that you have both elite technical skill and elite athleticism. Rarely do prospects who have both or even one of those traits get developed into defensive midfielders -- they become attackers or center-backs -- so there just don't seem to be that many players in the world who are capable of competently playing the holding-midfield position at the highest level.
At least, that's what the big clubs seem to think.
Heading into last summer, the most expensive defensive midfielder ever, per Transfermarkt's positional designations and listed fees, was Rodri, who moved from Atletico Madrid to Manchester City for €70 million all the way back in 2019. Since then, five players have moved for more than €70 million:
Caicedo: Brighton to Chelsea, €133 million
Enzo Fernández: Benfica to Chelsea, €121 million
Declan Rice: West Ham to Arsenal, €116.6 million
Aurelien Tchouameni: Monaco to Real Madrid, €80 million
Casemiro: Real Madrid to Manchester United, €70.7 million
Right after Rodri on the list are two more players who moved this summer: Sandro Tonali (AC Milan to Newcastle, €64 million) and Manuel Ugarte (Sporting Lisbon to PSG, €60 million). And if Chelsea's reported move for Southampton teenager Lavia goes through, he'd slot in right behind those two in terms of fees. In other words, eight of the nine most expensive defensive-midfielder transfers will have occurred over the past 13 months.
Liverpool, then, have three options. The first: settle for the ninth-most-expensive defensive midfield option. The second: trust in their ability to identify undervalued players. Or the third: change the setup so you don't need a $100 million midfielder to make everything work.
In the past, they would have gone with option No. 2 because under former sporting director Michael Edwards, Liverpool were always a couple of steps ahead in the transfer market. They weren't trying to sign players who didn't want to join the club, and they were rarely competing at the absolute top of the market, so you'd almost never hear about any kind of transfer saga, "preparing of bids," or what have you. They had a list of players, they signed the best available option, and then you'd suddenly see "Diogo Jota to Liverpool" being announced on a random Thursday afternoon.
That, uh, is not how things are working right now. Edwards left before last season, and his replacement, Julian Ward, left after this past season. In came Jorg Schmadtke, a friend of Klopp's whose arrival seemed to symbolize the manager's growing decision-making power with the club.
First, there was the fruitless, drawn-out pursuit of Jude Bellingham. And although the club did move quickly earlier in the summer to acquire Alexis Mac Allister (from Brighton) and Dominik Szoboszlai (from RB Leipzig), both of those moves were based around release clauses. Then came the we-have-upped-our-bid-by-one-million weekly updates about the continued failed attempts to sign Lavia from Southampton, only for the club to then suddenly agree to a British-club-record fee for Caicedo on Thursday night ... despite Caicedo seemingly not wanting to join the club.
And so, we come to Option 3.
Klopp is one of soccer's all-time great coaches in large part because of his willingness to do things differently. Do Liverpool need to do what everyone else is doing and just chase after the next expensive (and almost definitely overpriced) holding midfielder? Or can Klopp figure out a way to arrange his players that lessens the need for one of these all-everything-all-the-time players camped out in front of the back line?
I don't know what the switch would be, exactly, but he'd toyed around with Trent Alexander-Arnold playing at the base of midfield in preseason -- rather than drifting there over the course of a game.
I've previously thought the calls to move Alexander-Arnold into the midfield were inane; this was all happening while Liverpool were winning every trophy possible with him playing every minute of almost every game at right-back. But the dynamics of the team and player acquisition at large have changed. The market for star defense-first right-backs isn't particularly crowded right now. You could probably find one of those for half -- or even less than half -- of the Caicedo money, and then you could use the rest of those resources to bring in more young midfield depth, another young center-back or both.
Can you play your best passer at the base of midfield with some energetic legs in front of him (Szoboszlai, Mac Allister and even Curtis Jones) and a third great defender in the backline? If you can, it obviates the need to spend on the most overpriced position in the sport, and it also allows you to make marginal improvements across multiple other areas of the team rather than overpaying for one player in one position.
On top of that, I'm also skeptical that teams are valuing these players properly. The trend of spending nine figures on defensive midfielders has coincided with top teams adopting more conservative structures in possession and moving away from the two-attacking-fullback setup. As teams have begun to make it easier on their defensive midfielders, they've also spent way more on their defensive midfielders.
So in short, maybe the seemingly disastrous past couple of weeks for Liverpool could be a blessing in disguise. Shouldn't a creative manager be able to find a way to divvy up responsibilities throughout the rest of the starting lineup in a way that equates to the overall impact of what they think they're getting from an elite defensive midfielder?
There is, after all, no one right way to play this game. Klopp, just like Belichick, knows that better than anyone.